We have 2 pix 515 firewalls and 2 VPN 3000 concentrators connected to a 3640 router that connects to our ISP with 2 T-1's I have downloaded ciscos pix logging server for NT. Is there any problem that has come up trying to setup logging to Compaq server from the Pix? Any help would greatly be appreciated.
Tim Cornelius Sys-Net Admin LIFE Outreach International 817-267-4211 work 817-235-0961 cell -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Jongbloedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:20 PM To: firewall Subject: NAT w/ one to one mapping what pros/cons would you have if you had one<-->one nat mapping for your servers ie: web.server 192.168.1.5<-->216.191.221.51 mail.server 192.168.1.6<-->216.191.221.60 so the firewall is doing NAT with one to one mapping...there for your servers are useable over the net, but they have private ip's because the firewall has the real ip addy and is forwarding the requests. so my question is what would be the difference of just letting the servers have a real addres but yet behind a fire wall. part two: i am already running NAT, can i also do this one<-->one mapping as well? part three: on the machins that are being NATted (private ip's) what is the real address that is being spoofed? Or should i say, if i go to a website using a private ip machine, what address does the website think it is talking to? tia... _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
