Ben,
I've asked similar question a while ago and below is the excerpt of what
I've got in reply.
SonicWALL is very easy to setup and administer; it's not flexible as some
other products, however, and support sucks unless you buy a contract.
I would NOT recommend it unless you can't afford anything else. 
Just my $0.02.

Dimitri
P.S. The best firewall that I've seen so far (for our environment) was
CyberGuard's FireStar. I suggest you take a look at their website
http://www.cyberguard.com/SOLUTIONS/Solutions_Product1.html. 

<<-----Original Message-----
From: Peters, Michael [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewall Recommendations

AAACK!!!
ICK!
NO!
Stay away from SonicWALL!!!!!!!!

We have had the SonicWALL DMZ for two years... and it crashes weekly.  The
'reboot' which the manual says should take 10-20 seconds takes 5 minutes.
If it ever comes back up.  We've had corrupted firmware before, too.  Their
tech support does not exist (web page - fill it out, wait for them to call;
phone - IF you can find the number, "leave a message and you'll be added to
the support queue at the end of the business day").  Though I guess you can
buy premium support at the time of purchase.

It claims to be able to handle something like 1400 active connections.
Yet... It sends me an error & drops connections once it passes 100.  We've
only got 13 computers running through the damned thing though!  It probably
doesn't help that when it's "overloaded" it sends me a message every 30
seconds or so.  I'm not kidding, I've gotten hundreds of e-mail 'alerts'
from it.

Oh, and then there's the issue of configurability.  We CANNOT find a way to
let machines on the 'LAN' access the server on the 'WAN' even though we
opened ports 1-64000 TCP/UDP in both directions and checked all the right
boxes.  'IP Spoofs' (forgot to add an 'okay' address to the list) are
constant... Again, I get alerted every 30 seconds while it continues.  I
realize it's supposed to be there for security, but I need to have SOME
control over what it does.  Especially when it doesn't do what it claims it
can!

Oh, and within the last month it's started something new.  Attempting to
access the management interface will crash it instantly.

It's a good thing we're only using if for content filtering on public
internet stations.  As it is, we're desperately looking for a replacement
before this thing goes to the dump.  And before I have an 'oops' involving
shotguns, napalm, etc.



--------------------------------------------------------
Michael D. Peters
Information Technology

Lake Oswego Public Library
706 4th Street
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034

Phone: (503) 675-2537
Fax: (503) 675-2536

http://www.ci.oswego.or.us/library/library.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: Haeger, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewall Recommendations


Could I broaden the request a bit ?

The pain level has risen to management visibility and we are about to buy
our first FW.  Apparently Sonic Wall is a contender at the management level
based on price.  Could anyone comment on the limitations in Sonic Wall.

We have two IIS, 1 Exchange, two Novells, expectations of Citrix and
remotely accessed SQL 2000, 11 other sites, and a current visitor-hacker.

John Haeger
Georgia Legal Services Program
404 206 5405


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Dimitri Limanovski
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
                Sent:   Friday, June 29, 2001 11:23 AM
                To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Subject:        OT: Firewall Recommendations

                Hello all,
                I am looking for replacement for our
"not-so-gracefully-aged" SonicWALL DMZ
                and would like to hear any suggestions for a new candidate.
                Here's the list of options I'd like to see in new box:

                - Stateful packet inspection
                - NA(P)T
                - DHCP/DNS Service
                - IPSec VPN capabilities (both client-to-box and box-to-box)
                - Auto-update
                - Content Filtering
                - and most importantly, ability to create custom rules based
on certain triggers: i.e. if someone's running an attack against us I
want the firewall to automatically trigger an appropriate action (rule) that
I've setup earlier (block offending address for 72 hours for example),
instead of emailing me a warning.

                Any ideas are welcomed.
                Thanks!

                Dimitri
>>
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls

Reply via email to