I would make sure that the NAT transparency option is set. Also, since the client supports split tunneling, the client can also continue to communicate with his/her local lan segment by checking the option to exclude the local lan from the tunnel. Finally, the NAT transparency can use other ports than the default by changing this on the switch as well as the client the NAT transparency can be made more secure or get around blocked ports.
I hope this helps you. Lance ----- Original Message ----- From: "kk downing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:03 PM Subject: Cisco VPN with DSL PPOE on one end > > Hello, > We have a client who is using a Linksys DSL router > with built in VPN capabilites and we have a Cisco 5002 > VPN Concentrator on our end. We set up an IP Sec > tunnel between them. The problem is that we can see > and ping them from our side of the VPN however they > can't see or reach us. When i look at the connection > table on the VPN concentrator we see them but with > thier PPOE DSL IP and not the static IP we have > configured on the VPN device. Has anyone worked with a > similar set up(PPOE on one end of a VPN) and could > maybe shed some light on this? TIA > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Firewalls mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls > _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
