On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Laura A. Robinson wrote: > > No, you said it was the TRUE definition. > > No, I didn't. Learn to read. Everything else you typed is just more of the > same dogma and inability to *read*, so I'm finished with this discussion.
Ok, you said the more "accurate" definition wasn't the "true" one: John Strock in [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: "I have a few questions regarding setting up a DMZ." Bill Royds in 0000701c1db75$a6a12600$[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: "A true MZ(sic) is the net between teh firewall and the Internet, not behind a firewall," and then went on to describe that case and the service network case independently. You decided that Bill's definition of "true" was also applicable to service networks (which he described seperately in the above referenced message.) > So, brilliant one, how about if you yank your toes out of your throat and > drop this before you make yourself look any more foolish? How about you re-read Bill's message and look at what you said in context with it? Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions [EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
