This is usually done through UDP encapsulation. At 03:59 PM 4/10/2002 -0500, Noonan, Wesley wrote: >It's not an entirely accurate statement. It has to do with IPSEC and the >fact that intermediary devices can not alter the packet in any way. Many >vendors support using "IPSEC pass-thru" though, where by you permit certain >ports/protocols to pass-thru untouched. I need to get to a meeting, but a >quick google search should give you all the answers you want. > >HTH > >Wes Noonan, MCSE/MCT/CCNA/CCDA/NNCSS >Senior QA Rep. >BMC Software, Inc. >(713) 918-2412 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.bmc.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: James Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:03 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: VPN and NAT > >I've been told that I cannot have NAT running on the router before the >firewall if I want VPN functionality. Is there anyone who might be able >to explain the reason for this? > >Thanks, > >James >_______________________________________________ >Firewalls mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls >_______________________________________________ >Firewalls mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
_______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
