Hi Chris, What about this way (I'm more lucky I need only 1 Cisco VPN channel), so: TS with 2 NIC's, Cisco VPN 3.5 installed and after that unbinded from let say NIC 1. Default router defined only for NIC1, and routing for specific host/subnet through NIC2. In this scenario, you still have access to your TS through NIC1 and from TS to specific host/subnet through Cisco VPN channel. Alex Kvasnytskyy
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Hessmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN-Connection to PIX 515 Hello Bob, > sorry i misunderstood. I thought you were saying connect to the vpn, > then open the term server, not open term server, then the vpn client. Yes, that was not a very good description, sorry. > I can see why you are having problem though. I assume you are doing > this so that you can setup acls that say only esp from the term server > can go to peer xyz, or the remote peer saying only let term server xyz > pass. Is this true? Well, not really. I'm doing this because I would like to have one pc within our LAN on which every vpn to every PIX we could and must connect to is configured. Of course the access to this term server is restricted to the technicians who should connect and manage the remote LAN. So, does anyone has a idea about establishing a vpn without loosing the LAN-connection? -- cu Chris _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
