>
> > but not for the NetGAP, and Adminiweb.
> > it used to show stats, graphs, analaysis. change a few
> > definitions, (interfaces management) that's it.
>
> Which is fine, and a perfectly reasonable thing to do with SNMP.
> Personally I don't think firewall MIBs should have anything other than
> performance and interface stats (certainly not retrievable policies),
> but that's just me. As I said a few times, I have nothing (much) against
> RO SNMP, although I'd prefer it if people managed to write their SNMP
> implementations better (how hard is it? You give me an OID, I give you a
> string. Sheesh.)
>
As long as it is restrictive, and you aren't flashing stats to the world
<smile>, and not allowing interface management openly to all that bekon.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Account Management (unsubscribe, get/change password, etc) Please go to:
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
