On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:02:59PM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 15/11/12 15:53, Brendan Donegan wrote: > >On 15/11/12 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote: > >>On 15/11/12 10:26, Brendan Donegan wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>I've come across this critical FWTS failure on one system which > >>>otherwise looks fine for certification: > >>> > >>>FAILED [CRITICAL] KlogDisablingIRQ: Test 1, CRITICAL Kernel message: [ > >>>12.502739] Disabling IRQ #16 > >>>ADVICE: The kernel detected an irq storm. This is most probably an IRQ > >>>routing bug. > >>> > >>>(Full Log) > >>>http://paste.ubuntu.com/1359992/ > >>> > >>>Shall I raise a kernel bug for this and can anyone shed any light on the > >>>possible effects of this error/what it means? > >>> > >> > >>So, this kernel error comes from kernel/irq/spurious.c, > >>note_interrupt() which has detected that IRQ 16 has generated > 99900 > >>interrupts but it seems that it's not being responded to so the IRQ > >>has been disabled. We should have a bug filed and see why this is > >>misbehaving. > >> > >>I'd like to see what /proc/interrupts contains too. > >http://paste.ubuntu.com/1360502/ > > > >Pastebined just after running fwts and observing the failure. Anything > >telling? > >> > > Well, IRQ 16 is for eth0, so it's strange we're seeing that message, > but if it really is disabling IRQ 16 then ethernet will stop > working, so that needs looking at for sure.
Looks to me like IRQ 16 is for USB. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
