Michael wrote: So, according to Landauer, and many scientists who have read his work, the correspondence of information with the experienced, physical world is definite. End Michael.
Unfortunately, Landauer did not follow up his brilliant insight. He says: no logical relation without objects to represent the logical relation on. ("No information without representation!") What he did not say: We know (by combinatorics) how many logical relations can maximally come about by using n objects. We do not know how many objects are minimally needed to find w logical relations on. Retranslating in word usage of Michael: The correspondence of information with the experienced, physical world is a TWO-WAY correspondence. After these half-steps will have been met with the customary deep silence we can progress to the next thought: As we count back from information into "how many objects make so much information?", shall we take the objects with a fixed place or any place? I look forward the enlightened discussion that shall happen at that time. Until then, nice Summer: Karl _______________________________________________ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis