Observation: It is incredibly improper to compare a paradigm system which has as its functional thesis, the modeling of regional systems effectively isolated from interference and influence - to a paradigm system in which no dynamics are isolated from encounter and influence.
And its further inappropriate, to deny they have -no- operative commonalities, even in the face of different constraints definitions for each. The laws of physics are by consequence and without challenge, the SOURCE and precursive fount of anything and everything biological. If this postulate is not valid, then we would have to allow that our universe is one in which alternative rules of performance can be and have been 'inserted' randomly and capriciously expressed, without connectable rational with ANY previous patterns or uniformities of performances and actions. We would see random, pervasive, NON-SEQUITOR events everywhere and all the time. But we don't. We just don't. There are no random absurdities in the universe. There is pragmatic functional coordinated pervasive ORDER. Variations, yes. Differential alternatives, yes. Even strangenesses that haven't been cleverly or adequately modeled yet, yes. But no un-connectable Rules of Behavior that totally conflict with prior performances themata or rules of action organization. The laws of physics generate and enact the behaviors of biology. The schemata is a Coherent, across all possibilities of organization and behavior. Jamie Rose Ceptual Institute Jamie Rose Guy A Hoelzer wrote: > > Hi Karl, > > The answer is NO, but then this also applies to many other objects, such as > stars and tornadoes. All dissipative systems churn non-linearly, so I guess > you > would argue that the laws of Newton generally don't apply to dissipative > systems > as wholes. I wouldn't argue with that; however I refered to the laws of > physics, rather than the laws of Newton, which I meant to include > far-from-equilibrium thermodynamic systems, like "biologic bodies". > > Regards, > > Guy Hoelzer > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Fri 10/27/2006 1:47 AM > To: Guy A Hoelzer; [email protected] > Subject: [Fis] Laws of physics do NOT apply in biology > > Hi Guy A Hoelzer, > > the laws of Newton do not apply in biology. Or, have you ever seen a biologic > body that remains in an idle state or keeps its linear movement forward? > > Karl > > _______________________________________________ > fis mailing list > [email protected] > http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis _______________________________________________ fis mailing list [email protected] http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis
