Hi there Stan
>  
>SS: Info theory presumably applies to everything and anything. 
>
>GR: It was never intended to apply to anything but communication instruments. 
>That is sending English language down a pipe.
Sorry, but it has already been done by people like Wheeler, Gell-Mann and 
Hawking. You are not going to win against them.

GR: I don't recall Wheeler or Hawking relating Information theory to organic 
systems.

Also, much broader usages have been developed over time in many other 
disciplines than physics. Shannon invented communications theory, which is a 
branch of information theory. Information was used more broadly before his work 
(e.g. Schroedinger, Szillard) in organic chemistry, thermodynamics and biology. 



GR: John show me these specific references, i have some of the original texts 
on 
Information theory there is no mention of Schroedinger or Szillard using 
Information theory in thermodynamics and biology or organic chemistry.

Information thoery and its relation to physics was done by Johnson and Nyquest 
to my knowledge.



GR: In my opinion it still only does, I cant get my head around how say 
information theory actually applies to direct human communication or organic 
sensing systems.  All our sensing systems are energy transduction systems, once 
inside the individual it 's moved via Na/K pumps aided by ADP to ATP 
conversions 
to the brain all electrical, chemical energy. So in the environment it's just a 
sound (phonon) or light (photon) or chemical or heat energy where are the bits 
(information theory part) or markers. They are just not there. 

>
>Unless this information is what underlies energy and is what makes up the rest 
>of the universe including dark matter and dark energy. And is also what 
>underlies the theory of Geometricdynamics.(Relativity theory)..?????? How so I 
>would not know.
Information has to be interpreted. It does not come with meaning, attached, 
though standard conventions, habits, biological predispositions and  the like 
can obscure this.

The full relation between information and energy still needs to be worked out, 
I 
believe. 


GR: You can say that again. 

However, information can be used to do work with no additional energy input 
(see 
some past posts on this topic), which suggests a very close connection.

GR: That's thermodynamically impossible. Any organic system requires to convert 
and transduce energy so you may think it does no work but the relationship is 
like Ostwald's Ripening there is always an energy cost. 


Regards
Gavin




________________________________
 Professor John Collier, Acting HoS  and Acting Deputy HoS
               colli...@ukzn.ac.za
Philosophy and Ethics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041 South Africa
T: +27 (31) 260 3248 / 260 2292       F: +27 (31) 260 3031
http://collier.ukzn.ac.za/
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to