Dear Gordana and colleagues,

Your quotation "But I would rather risk such reproaches than accept the present situation, in which philosophers argue only with dead biologists and biologists only with dead philosophers... " is quite funny and descriptive. In my terms, the recombination of knowledge is a slow, generationally driven process, except maybe in "revolutionary" periods like today. Thus, in spite of Peirce scholarly greatness, and his crucial involvement in the creation of "pragmatism", it does not follow that this general philosophy or his semiotician stance, elaborated almost three generations ago, make a good match with the current developments in "connectomics" and in the "motor-centered approach" attempted by contemporary neuroscientists. My hunch is that a new information philosophy is needed in order to coherently link not only with the neurosciences but also with biology and Q Info science and advanced Artificial Intelligence. The unfortunately missing neurosceintific aspect is really crucial for our common enterprise, and it is a discussion we must promote in the list...

There is a very interesting attempt in the theoretical-biological arena that may be taken as a model for the neuroscience missing link. It is the INBIOSA project (www.inbiosa.eu <http://www.inbiosa.eu>), that promotes a new integration paradigm about theoretical biology, biomathematics, and biocomputing. It is a preliminary European project funded by the EU, and some FISers know it very well as they (we) are already cooperating in this initiative. Somehow, what inbiosa attempts is the "what is life" of our times... It has been promoted by Plamen Simeonov, Andrée Ehresmann, Leslie Smith, Bruno Marchal, and others. They have recently joined our own discussion list (let me welcome them publicly!). In the extent to which a general multidisciplinary discussion may be convenient for them at some developmental stage, they are invited to chair some FIS future discussion session.

By the way, given that we have almost discontinued with James' presentation on medieval science, maybe it is time that he writes down a discussion "colophon"... We have had a nice time with his historical panorama (particularly in the scholarly "disputatione" so enlivened by Jerry's musings). Thanks, James!

best wishes

---Pedro



Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic escribió:

Dear Joseph,

Thank you for this precise clarification. I agree completely and I also follow tensions and changes in our discussions in the list.

Especially interesting to me is how theories or frameworks communicate, use each other and internalize each other.

(I believe that is essentially the same process as the one you mention for the change of Logic in Reality itself).

Currently there are ongoing paradigm shifts in computing, logic, biology, cognitive science, information science and several others.

Not all research fields get "updated" instantly, it takes time.

Interdisciplinary discussions sometimes contain criticisms built on presupposition about other research fields as they looked like some time before.

(I meet often the idea that computing is the same as the Turing Machine model. But there is strong development of new computational paradigms and even if they are not completely established, they already exist in some fragmentary form.)

"But I would rather risk such reproaches than accept the present situation, in which philosophers argue only with dead biologists and biologists only with dead philosophers... "
Michael Morange,  Life Explained

So I think this list is a good example of living philosophers talking with living biologists and other living FISers which makes it much more exciting and difficult.

Best regards,

Gordana


--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Avda. Gómez Laguna, 25, Pl. 11ª
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Telf: 34 976 71 3526 (& 6818) Fax: 34 976 71 5554
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to