Msg. from Joseph Brenner

---------------------------------------------------------------


       Von: [email protected]
       Datum: 17.01.2012 17:09
       An: <[email protected]>, "Pedro C.
       Marijuan"<[email protected]>,
       "Ted"<[email protected]>, "Krassimir"<[email protected]>
       Kopie: "fislist"<[email protected]>
       Betreff: AW: Sorry. I think,

       ->
       Dear QTQ,

       Thank you for this most interesting restatement to which I can
       relate much more positively than to your previous one. I think
       you have captured well here the fundamental role and some of the
       dialectic characteristics of information, also of a science of
       information as I see them.

       Just two comments if I may: 1) like information itself, your
       theory is, like my own, partly true and partly false. Thus if
       one says that "information is everything", you risk losing
       meaning rather than gaining it. 2) I disagree with Wiener's
       statement and believe that it has contaminated the discussion of
       information for "60 years". Information cannot, in my view, be
       separated from the energy that constitutes it, and whose
       properties it, also, embodies.

       Something that is, as I fully agree, "self-contradictory"
       requires a new logic (perhaps my Logic in Reality is a
       candidate) and new mode of thinking (Wu's Informational
       Thinking, for example) for proper analysis. It is tools like
       this, including as I said last year your schema of three
       attributes FOR SOME ABSTRACT ASPECTS of information, not all of
       them, that can help make progress.

       Best wishes,

Joseph
           ----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----
           Von: [email protected]
           Datum: 17.01.2012 09:26
           An: "Pedro C. Marijuan"<[email protected]>, "Joseph
           Brenner"<[email protected]>,
           "Ted"<[email protected]>, "Krassimir"<[email protected]>
           Kopie: "fislist"<[email protected]>
           Betreff: Sorry. I think,

           Dear Pedro, Dear Joseph, Dear Ted, Dear Krassimir, Dear FIS
           Colleagues,

           Sorry. I think, any science in whole discipline on world is
           information science, in other words, all sciences are
           science about information.

           Floridi.L wrote, Information has thus arisen as a concept as
           fundamental and important as “being”, “knowledge”, “life”,
           “intelligence”, “meaning” or “good and evil”—all pivotal
           concepts with which it is interdependent and so equally
           worthy of autonomous investigation. It is also a more
           impoverished concept, in terms of which the other can be
           expressed and interrelated, when not defined. In this sense,
           Evans was right: Evans had the idea that there is a much
           cruder and more fundamental concept than that of knowledge
           on which philosophers have concentrated so much, namely the
           concept of information. (Luciano Floridi: "What is the
           Philosophy of Information?" 2002.) But I think that
           information cover “being”, “knowledge”, “life”,
           “intelligence”, “meaning” or “good and evil”.

           Information is considered an ambiguity used confusedly.
           Information actually can be both material and mental,
           existing or conscious, produced or received, true or false,
           real or fictitious, right or wrong, remembered or forgotten,
           known or unknown; it can exist objectively but cannot be
           perceived subjectively, or vice versa; and it can be
           powerful or weak, have tangible or intangible value, and so
           on. True information is mingled with false, and sometimes it
           appears while sometimes it disappears. So, information,
           conventionally understood, is self-contradictory.

           In 1948 Wiener put forward, “Information is information, not
           matter or energy.” What is the Information? This “Wiener
           maze” has been 60 years since the essential attributes of
           information were explored in the field of philosophy. I
           think, Information is the collection of three kinds of
           attributes of things.( Tian-qing Qiao. Definition and
           Essence of Information. tripleC 9(2): 342-346, 2011 ISSN
           1726-670X http://www.triple-c.at) Otherwise, never shall we
           understand the concept “information”.

            (Reference: Crick, Francis. The Astonishing Hypothesis –The
           Scientific Search for the Soul. 1994.)

           Best wishes

           QTQ





           -----------------------------------

_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
[email protected]
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to