-------- Original Message -------- Subject: TT, CRA, SGP. Meaning in Artificial Agents Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:41:14 +0100 From: Christophe Menant <[email protected]> To: Pedro Marijuan <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Pedro, Here is the message. Thanks for reentering it. Christophe TT, CRA, SGP. Meaning in Artificial Agents Dear FISers, Most of us would agree that Turing Test (TT), Chinese Room Argument (CRA) & Symbol Grounding Problem (SGP) aim at positioning information generation as being from humans or from artificial agents (AAs). So you may be interested by an AISB/IACAP2012 presentation <http://crmenant.free.fr/IACAP-AISB2012-C.Menant-050712.pdf> on subject. An analysis of these three tools is proposed under the banner of “meaning generation”. It is shown that the capability for an AA to generate human like meanings can be a reading of TT, CRA & SGP (1). The Meaning Generator System (MGS) is used, as applicable to any agent submitted to a constraint (2). The concerns highlighted are that animal and human constraints are not today transferrable to AAs. An entry point is proposed by extending a “stay alive” constraint to AAs. Ethical concerns are highlighted. Continuations are proposed. Christophe Menant (1) Paper is available at http://cogprints.org/8716/ and in proceedings at http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/~gdc/work/AISB-IACAP-2012/NaturalComputingProceedings-2012-06-22.pdf <http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/%7Egdc/work/AISB-IACAP-2012/NaturalComputingProceedings-2012-06-22.pdf> (2) http://cogprints.org/3694/ ------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ fis mailing list [email protected] https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
