*From:* Joseph Brenner <mailto:joe.bren...@bluewin.ch> *To:* Stanley N Salthe <mailto:ssal...@binghamton.edu> ; fis <mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es> *Sent:* Sunday, December 30, 2012 6:22 PM *Subject:* Re: [Fis] dark matter
Dear Stan, Gordana, John, Bruno, Bob U., Yuri and All, I think we have all been dancing around the obvious: Stan described the situation we are in as a "remnant continuing expansion", but this implies an expansion /relative/ to something or /against/ something, some constraint. The model of the universe would be cyclical, but this is accepted by some leading cosmologists. For me therefore, we should not only be talking about what dark matter /is /or dark energy /is/ but see them as inherent relational properties which appear (already) to be in some sort of dynamic reciprocal relation, in which one form of energy is primarily potential and the other actual. This is where Yuri and Bob U. come in: they both have some pretty sophisticated mathematical tools which I hope might be applied not to the theoretical entities but to the (equally theoretical, of course, for the time being) relations between them. Happy Western New Year! Joseph ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Stanley N Salthe <mailto:ssal...@binghamton.edu> *To:* fis <mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es> *Sent:* Sunday, December 30, 2012 4:30 PM *Subject:* Re: [Fis] dark matter John -- You said: There is no other evidence for a change in G, though it has been postulated. What is the compelling evidence for stable G? I would think that if galaxies at known distances would be resolved without dark matter using different values of G, that this would itself be the evidence for change that would be required. But we would not be likely to discover this if we hold G constant by fiat, or simply because it simplifies calculations. The dynamics to be explained apply to both near and far galaxies, apparently in much the same way. The near galaxies would have G much closer to our own value in the case of evolving G. Perhaps most important, they apply to our local group of galaxies. These would be brought into the calculations as well, of course. Overall we would expect that the most distant galaxies would require the greatest G in order to explain their configuration, with G getting smaller and smaller as we approach the present time. If so, this would provide another evidence for the Big Bang. I note that the evidence for "dark energy" is much weaker. I have felt this as well. I have been wondering why our recent discovery of current accelerating expansion could not simply be interpreted as a remnant continuing expansion. STAN John Collier On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, John Collier <colli...@ukzn.ac.za <mailto:colli...@ukzn.ac.za>> wrote: Stan, there are several reasons that a change in gravity will not explain the effects of supposed dark matter. I list them below. *From:* fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es <mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es> [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es <mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es>] *On Behalf Of *Stanley N Salthe *Sent:* 29 December 2012 04:52 PM *To:* fis *Subject:* [Fis] dark matter Gordana has said: Information and Energy/Matter What can we hope for from studies of information related to energy/matter (as it appears for us in space/time)? Information is a concept known for its ambiguity in both common, everyday use and in its specific technical applications throughout different fields of research and technology. However, most people are unaware that matter/energy today is also a concept surrounded by a disquieting uncertainty. What for Democritus were building blocks of the whole universe appear today to constitute only 4% of its observed content. (NASA 2012) [1] The rest is labeled “dark matter” (conjectured to explain gravitational effects otherwise unaccounted for) and “dark energy” (introduced to account for the expansion of the universe). We do not know what “dark matter” and “dark energy” actually are. This indicates that our present understanding of the structure of the physical world needs re-examination. [...] Information and Energy/Matter Gordana Dodig Crnkovic Information 2012, 3(4), 751-755; http://unam.us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=ae24f18d1e&e=d38efa683e <http://unam.us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=ae24f18d1e&e=d38efa683e> Special Issue "Information and Energy/Matter" http://unam.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=ea193b9747&e=d38efa683e <http://unam.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=ea193b9747&e=d38efa683e> See it on Scoop.it (http://unam.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=cdfa764e97&e=d38efa683e <http://unam.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=cdfa764e97&e=d38efa683e>) , via Papers (http://unam.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=e23b9e2cd9&e=d38efa683e <http://unam.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0eb0ac9b4e8565f2967a8304b&id=e23b9e2cd9&e=d38efa683e>) I would like to inquire whether any fis'rs might react to the following notion: Dark matter is postulated because the amount of matter detectable in galaxies would be insufficient alone to explain how they hold together given the value of the gravitational constant. However, the information we glean from galaxies represents their condition as it was a very long time ago, in an earlier universe. Is it not possible to resolve this puzzle less radically than by inventing dark matter by supposing that the gravitational constant has not been constant but has instead been changing, and was much stronger in the past, which is when we detect these distant clusters of matter? Perhaps G as been scaled to the rate of expansion of space? Perhaps the rate of expansion was greater then than now, even with current acceleration? My response: 1. There is no other evidence for a change in G, though it has been postulated. 2. The dynamics to be explained apply to both near and far galaxies, apparently in much the same way. 3. Perhaps most important, they apply to our local group of galaxies. I note that the evidence for "dark energy" is much weaker. John ======= Please find our Email Disclaimer here-->: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer ======= ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis -- ------------------------------------------------- Pedro C. Marijuán Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA) Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X 50009 Zaragoza, Spain Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818) pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ ------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ fis mailing list fis@listas.unizar.es https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis