Hi 王小红
That would lead to the human's lost of (Turing) universality, and
would be an advantage for some higher level entity in which humans
would be the equivalent of specialized cells. You can compare this
with the amoeba lost of immortality and "freedom", when beginning to
cooperate through multicellular organism.
Your views are very interesting to me, reminding me of Karl Popper's
idea. He claims to insist on freedom alone, because he doubts that
the coexistent of freedom and equality will be a fantasy. As you
mentioned "amoeba", do they have "freedom", no, the only thing they
own is equality, they have lost the intention of freedom, for they
lost individuality.
An amoeba has more freedom in a pond than a white blood cell, which
has a job to do in the multicellular organism. Don't take that
"freedom" to much seriously, the image was a bit poetical.
Personally, I think humans should try to keep their Turing
universality at all costs, but corporations will opposes naturally
to this. The tension between universality at different levels is
unavoidable.
Indeed, as far as army this kind of systems are concerned, the
complete equality without individuality is required in order to keep
each soldier in step effectively when in emergent and dangerous
situation.
In the army, OK. in the civil society, in time of peace: we should
avoid that, and encourage people to be themselves and develop their
differences, that means exploiting their own universality. I think.
Best,
Bruno
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
