While the interviews on the video are interesting, in general, I also find them a bit annoying. I never hear "information" actually described in a specific way. They could as easily be discussing "raw data" as far as I can tell. For example, when is "meaning" associated with information (or data) and how does that meaning arise, who/what is ascribing meaning, etc..? The interview could have gone much further, and did not seem particularly well thought out in advance. Without a clear sense of how "information" is being used here, subsequent thoughts would seem to be equally unclear or confused (to my mind).
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
