Dear FIS Colleagues,
Some parties have doubts on how to count the two messages per week --the
maximum allowed in this list except for the discussion chair, which
currently is Alex. Following the international business week, the count
starts on Monday and obviously ends on Sunday night. Not abiding by this
rule leads to posting sanctions. The idea is to keep a reasonable
traffic, to allow participation of more people, and to promote quiet,
"reflective" posting beyond the merely excited and "reactive". Remember
that people willing to check about the recent exchanges may go to:
http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/
https://www.mail-archive.com/fis@listas.unizar.es/
As a brief note to Alex: it is fine that we are discussing all these
curious and advanced themes here (and I do not want to interfere), but
thinking that we are getting close to the end of this whole
phenomenology session, and that Plamen's concluding topic will try to
open some inroads in the applied realm, starting with some contemplation
of basic multidisciplinary questions could be convenient, at least as a
bridge. For instance (in my very personal interpretation):
1. What is the advantage of the phenomenological view in a basic
information problem (relationship between "world", "object as living
subject", "inquirer as heterogeneous communities of inquirers"). At
least this is a real problem of mine when trying to update the scheme of
cellular signaling relationships with the environment.
2. What is the advantage of the phenomenological view regarding the
entire information problem (transcending the different "provincial"
approaches to information"?
3. What is the advantage of the phenomenological view regarding the
multidisciplinary conundrum (the accelerated expansion in the number of
disciplines--several thousands nowadays, probably close to 10,000) and
the more and more difficult synthesis and integration?
4. What is the advantage of closely relating phenomenology with Buddhist
"metaphysics" (as has been done continuously in the recent discussions
here)?
Of course, these are dense points --to disregard "reactively"-- and
better to let them resurface in coming days. Now, in order to facilitate
the ongoing discussion on Godel's, Dr. Albert Johnstone has joined the
fis list today (thanks are due to Maxine).
Best greetings---Pedro
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
