Dear Folks, It is very important to not be hasty and assume that the warning Professor Rossler made is to be taken seriously. It is relatively easy to check if a mathematical reasoning is true or false. It is much more difficult to see if a piece of mathematics is correctly alligned to physical prediction. Note also that a reaction such as "THIS STORY IS A GOOD REASON FOR SHUTTING DOWN CERN PERMANENTLY AND SAVING A LOT OF LARGELY WASTED MONEY.”. Is not in the form of scientific rational discussion, but rather in the form of taking a given conclusion for granted and using it to support another opinion that is just that - an opinion.
By concatenating such behaviors we arrive at the present political state of the world. This is why, in my letter, I have asked for an honest discussion of the possible validity of Professor Rossler’s arguments. At this point I run out of commentary room for this week and I shall read and look forward to making further comments next week. Best, Lou Kauffman > On Jan 9, 2017, at 7:17 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es> > wrote: > > From Alex Hankey > > -------- Mensaje reenviado -------- > > Asunto: Re: [Fis] A Curious Story > Fecha: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:55:55 +0530 > De: Alex Hankey <alexhan...@gmail.com> <mailto:alexhan...@gmail.com> > Para: PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es> > <mailto:pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es> > > THIS STORY IS A GOOD REASON FOR SHUTTING DOWN CERN PERMANENTLY AND SAVING A > LOT OF LARGELY WASTED MONEY. > > On 5 January 2017 at 16:36, PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ > <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es <mailto:pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es>> wrote: > Dear FISers, > > Herewith the Lecture inaugurating our 2017 sessions. > I really hope that this Curious Story is just that, a curiosity. > But in science we should not look for hopes but for arguments and > counter-arguments... > > Best wishes to All and exciting times for the New Year! > --Pedro > > > > De: Otto E. Rossler [oeros...@yahoo.com <mailto:oeros...@yahoo.com>] > Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de enero de 2017 17:51 > Para: PEDRO CLEMENTE MARIJUAN FERNANDEZ > Asunto: NY session > ---------------------- > > A Curious Story > > Otto E. Rossler, University of Tübingen, Germany > > Maybe I am the only one who finds it curious. Which fact would then make it > even more curious for me. It goes like this: Someone says “I can save your > house from a time bomb planted into the basement” and you respond by saying > “I don’t care.” This curious story is taken from the Buddhist bible. > > It of course depends on who is offering to help. It could be a lunatic person > claiming that he alone can save the planet from a time-bomb about to be > planted into it. In that case, there would be no reason to worry. On the > other hand, it could also be that you, the manager, are a bit high at the > moment so that you don't fully appreciate the offer made to you. How serious > is my offer herewith made to you today? > > I only say that for eight years' time already, there exists no counter-proof > in the literature to my at first highly publicized proof of danger. I was > able to demonstrate that the miniature black holes officially attempted to be > produced at CERN do possess two radically new properties: > > they cannot Hawking evaporate > they grow exponentially inside matter > > If these two findings hold water, the current attempt at producing ultra-slow > miniature black holes on earth near the town of Geneva means that the > slower-most specimen will get stuck inside earth and grow there exponentially > to turn the planet into a 2-cm black hole after several of undetectable > growth. Therefore the current attempt of CERN's to produce them near Geneva > is a bit curious. > > What is so curious about CERN's attempt? It is the fact that no one finds it > curious. I am reminded of an old joke: The professor informs the candidate > about the outcome of the oral exam with the following words “You are bound to > laugh but you have flunked the test.” I never understood the punchline. I > likewise cannot understand why a never refuted proof of the biggest danger of > history leaves everyone unconcerned. Why NOT check an unattended piece of > luggage on the airport called Earth? > > To my mind, this is the most curious story ever -- for the very reason that > everyone finds it boring. A successful counter-proof would thus alleviate but > a single person’s fears – mine. You, my dear reader, are thus my last hope > that you might be able to explain the punch line to me: “Why is it that it > does not matter downstairs that the first floor is ablaze?” I am genuinely > curious to learn why attempting planetocide is fun. Are you not? > > For J.O.R. > --------------- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es <mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es> > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > <http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis> > > > > > -- > Alex Hankey M.A. (Cantab.) PhD (M.I.T.) > Distinguished Professor of Yoga and Physical Science, > SVYASA, Eknath Bhavan, 19 Gavipuram Circle > Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India > Mobile (Intn'l): +44 7710 534195 > Mobile (India) +91 900 800 8789 > ____________________________________________________________ > > 2015 JPBMB Special Issue on Integral Biomathics: Life Sciences, Mathematics > and Phenomenological Philosophy > <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00796107/119/3>_______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
