On 9/5/06, Martin Baehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:17:02AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: > > function foo > > [default implementation] > > end > > > > if some_weird_condition > > function foo > > [special case] > > end > > end > > > > seems like a reasonable thing to do. > > you could easely write that as: > > if some_weird_condition > function foo > [special case] > end > else > function foo > [default implementation] > end > end > > so the remaining question is, whether restricting a function redefinition > is actually useful.
Yes, there are other ways of writing the same thing. But I'm not sure I see the advantage in enforcing this specific coding style. > > greetings, martin. > -- > cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix > offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world > -- > pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org > unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at > administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.org > Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ > -- Axel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
