On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 06:24:27PM -0800, Chris Rebert wrote: > Under your scheme, I'd type "foo" and then hit the up arrow a million > times looking for the line I want, whereas in fish, I just have to > remember one distinguishing *part* of the command, and it'll be > completed by hitting the up arrow.
what about making it search the beginning first and and if it fails to find anything then look in the middle? unlikely to have a command that starts with -y or a filename. greetings, martin. -- cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world -- pike programmer working in new zealand open-steam.org|webhaven.co.nz unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.org Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
