2009/2/2 James Reeves <[email protected]>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Axel Liljencrantz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I checked out your repository. Nice work. I've gone through the patches
> and
> > applied the mimedb patch and autoconf patches. Didn't apply the gitignore
> > patch, since it doesn't make sense when not using git.
> >
> > Anyway, nice work and let me know if you want to be part of the official
> > mainline of fish instead of the unofficial fork. :)
>
> I can keep the github repository up to date, if that's what you mean :)
>
> I was planning on anyway, as Github is quite a useful site for
> collaboration and experimentation, and it doesn't cost me much time to
> run darcs-to-git. I'm afraid I'd be a pretty bad maintainer, though.
> I'm generally very happy with Fish, so I don't have much incentive to
> fix things.
>
Well, if it's already perfect... What is there left to do.
To be quite honest, I have no real vision for a fantastical new breakthrough
in fish either. There are a couple of semi-large changes that I am
considering, such as making the history search actually show a multi-item
list, for faster navigation, and making completion code run in the
background while you type to offer suggestions in real time, but nothing too
major.
By the way, thank you for creating Fish. It's by far my shell of choice.
>
You're welcome. :)
Axel
>
> - James
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
