Sure, seems reasonable. Go for it if you like. Thanks, _fish
On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Jan Kanis <jan.c...@jankanis.nl> wrote: > Hi fish, > > Regarding commits 798537d47b and 4683ce2771f7, wouldn't it be better to just > remove the __warn_unused attribute from the exec_subshell definition? > According to the gcc docs that attribute should only be used if a return > value should never be ignored, which isn't the case here. > > Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
