I've just noticed some odd behaviour around previous command completion 
on Ubuntu 12.04 with the apt-get fish package (2.0.0).

When the greyed our part of the command makes the command longer that 
the available space the greyed out part shows '...', and when the typed 
part of the command is too long the the command is pushed down a line 
however the greyed out part of the command doesn't show at all. These 
problems only happen when the line is not long enough

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/y500ba1ui~q5.png 
<http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/y500ba1ui%7Eq5.png>
line long enough, expected behaviour

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/jzd4w23oy1d8.png
enough room for typed chars ('fin') but not enough room for greyed out 
part, it shows ... and doesn't move down to next line

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/v45_x0v642_5.png
then when there's not enough room for the typed part of the command it 
does drop down to the next line but doesn't show the greyed out part at all

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/hq1~dicecd6c.png 
<http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/hq1%7Edicecd6c.png>
after pressing ctrl+f the command is completed so that works, it's just 
not showing what the completion would be

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45079992/Screenshots/oqhw127gvn_s.png
screenshot from my mac (1.23.1, an old fishfish version) which shows the 
expected behaviour (note there is enough room for the typed chars ('fi') 
on the previous line however the command is pushed down to the next line 
because there's not enough room for the greyed out part

Has anyone seen this behaviour before? Should I create an issue on github?

Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users

Reply via email to