On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Mandeep Sandhu <mandeepsandhu....@gmail.com> wrote: >> the changes on the completions into fish upstream. Other shells don't >> usually provide completions for foreign programs, for example systemd >> provides bash and zsh completions, while fish provides completions for >> systemd. > > Thats probably because of the popularity/omnipresence of shells like > bash. That's why the foreign program authors have an incentive to > provide bash completions in order for their program to be more > appealing/user-friendly. > > Till the time fish-shell reaches that level of popularity, I guess we > keep on providing completions as part of fish.
I'll happily maintain obnam.fish further until we have this: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Siteshwar <sitesh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Probably we can add another directory in $fish_complete_path where authors > of other utilities can keep their completions and it should get priority > over other completions. That is a very good idea! Where would that be? /usr/share/fish/external_completions or something shorter comes to my mind. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
