Fish doesn't control the output of ls in any way. It does provide a function that wraps the command in a function to make sure that the colors are turned on - or at least try to. Since LS_COLORS works for your ls, that's the thing to use.
The '*' (and '/', '@', etc.) are also from ls, not fish. It's also being turned on by the ls function ridiculous_fish mentions. You'll have to write your own version of that to not turn it on. Just using funced to make it not set --indicator-style to classify, or set it to what you prefer, and then funcsave to save that should do the trick. At least, if you set -Ux LS_COLORS. On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:43 PM Mandeep Sandhu <mandeepsandhu....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to configure the output of `ls`, specifically the colors. > > After googling a bit, I landed on this answer by ridiculous_fish himself: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25560595/how-do-i-change-the-colour-of-directory-listings-with-oh-my-fish > > However, the suggestion in this answer does not have any affect on the > ls color output. However, if I set the "LS_COLORS" variable with > values from the "dircolors" output, then the colors start taking > effect. So which variable am I supposed to set? > > I'm using fish 2.0.0 on OSX (Yosemite). > > Also, currently, fish shows an astrix after any executable. I want to > change this to show it with a brighter/bolder color instead of the > astrix. Where do I configure this? I couldn't find this in the > reference docs. > > Thanks, > -mandeep > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Fish-users mailing list > Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
