[This message was posted by Rolf Andersson of Pantor Engineering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/cc2363e0 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
session layer != FIX codec > that makes sense. if someone who doesn't use FIX will have to handle > FAST to their format AND then in the requests they send they'd have to > use Internal to FIX. Performance hit and complexity both i guess. > > But being a point to point implementation I'm quite unsure how i > could have my session layer which is in FIX handle without the > subscribers being able to handle FIX. I totally understand in > multicast implementation such as ARCA or ISE heartbeats and gapfills > aren't required at all but being a TCP recovery would be done by the > FIX session. > > Correct me if i'm wrong. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to FIX-Protocol@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
