[This message was posted by mark qiu of csc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST 
Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply 
to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/81a2dbd5 - PLEASE DO NOT 
REPLY BY MAIL.]

there is one. http://www.openfast.org
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone used the FastFix Decoder available from the cme. 
> > > > http://www.cmegroup.com/globex/resources/fix-fast-decoder-
> > > > agreement.html
> > > >
> > > > If so, how would you rate it's performance?
> > > >
> > > > It decodes and then generates the fix strings. Our initial tests
> > > > show that it takes 1.7ms to do this for each message. I presuming
> > > > I should be aiming for much faster times than this?
> > > >
> > > > Many Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > - Lee.
> > >
> > > Taking this question a little further, has anyone used the C++
> > > Decoder?
> > >
> > > -jd-
> > Hello! I have been evaluating the C++ CME decoder, and found many
> > limitations and bugs. First it only implements a subset of FAST 1.1
> > (e.g., no Group Field Instruction); then it's unable to build codecs
> > from XML containing TemplateRef tags; then it's been designed to run
> > exactly once on a buffer containing one or more FAST messages -- that
> > is many statics, and various states not easily resetables. It is not
> > thread safe at all. Finally it's got some bugs, causing it to core
> > dump on some of CME's own feeds (such as snapshots) (due to incorect
> > PMAP handling).
> >
> >
> > All this considered, this piece of code is indeed very useful as a
> > "bootstrap" into coding a decoder, but by no mean something useful in
> > production.
> >
> > I'd recommend either going with a off the shelf product, or develop
> > one from scratch.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > JS
> 
> I've found the same issues as well. The statics and thread-safety issues
> were what stood out to me.
> 
> I really wish there was an open-source project for FAST like QuickFIX.
> There are so many gotcha's with FAST you really need a large set of
> eye's to make sure all criteria has been met.
> 
> -jd-


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to