[This message was posted by CHRIS AKERS of London Stock Exchange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/58fca1da - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hello, I'm looking for some steer with regards to FIX 3rd Party Hubs and whether or not it violates protocol or accepted convention for Hubs to send Business Message Rejects (j) from themselves. Having checked as many protocol documents as I can find there's nothing that specifically states this should not be done but I'm thinking that, strictly speaking, a Hub should only be dealing with FIX messages at a session level so any Business Message Rejects it sends should only be on behalf of one of it's subscribers. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Is it likely to 'confuse' any OMS' or engines out there that would not expect a BMR from a hub or, if they received one, would assume 115 would be present in the message? Many Thanks, Chris. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
