[This message was posted by Rolf Andersson of Pantor Engineering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/a5652212 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
I seem to remember that your company did a deal with Spryware some time ago. If this Q is related to the FASTOR I suggest you discuss with Dan. /Rolf > Rolf, you are describing Fast 1.1 compliance. I have a Fast 1.0 data > source I would like to continue supporting, preferably using a Fast 1.1 > code base with as little hacking as possible. > > The question is really this: > > Is there a way of using FAST 1.1 templates to describe an encoding > scheme where the template for the second half of the message is > determined by the value of a field in the first part of the message? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
