[This message was posted by Franco Sabini of Banca Fineco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/b3c19c9f - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> I made some additional performance improvements by elliminating > unnecessary memcpys, and while I did see the marginal improvement in > latency, but in terms of CPU the FAST decoder is 20% while NON-Fast is > never above 13%, and is mostly 10% at the rate of 50 messages/per > second. I can probably squeeze a bit more - but I think my > implementation is almost optimal. Hello, we have just passed the CME certification and moved our feed handler in production. Our software is using more processor than the non-fast older decoder, would you have some hints on how optimize the cme code ? Thanks Franco [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
