[This message was posted by Rolf Andersson of Pantor Engineering <[email protected]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/b1cfbe05 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hi Patrick, I'm looking forward to the summary of differences section. For the continued discussion, I would like to suggest that we let "FAST subset" imply that "a FAST subset stream can be encoded/decoded by a standard FAST encoder/decoder" Best, Rolf > Hi Rolf, > > I will gladly explain the differences between FAST and my proposal and > identify those parts that I have attempted to subset. I agree that it is > not a pure subset, the Nmap for example is an addition. I will add a > comparison section to the front of the proposal document. > > Scott Atwell was kind enough to explain the proposal submission > procedure to me, and there are several stages prior to public review. > Whilst I am still intersted in feedback, anyone outside of the > working group should clearly delay any review until the request is > formally made. > > Thanks again for taking the time to read the proposal. > > Patrick [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
