[This message was posted by Hanno Klein of Deutsche Börse Systems <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/1b591a3a - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Correct, any change to orders should be communicated by means of the ER, regardless which side initiated the change. If you will, the amend or cancel case is no different than the (partial) fill of an order sitting on the book, i.e. something happens with the order at the market place. > Right, tag 100 and 207 should not be replaced, however, am I correct of > using execution report for unsol amend and usol cancel? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
