[This message was posted by William Hooper of NA <[email protected]> to the 
"FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can 
reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/f27e08b0 - PLEASE DO 
NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

I had a quick look at the documents you posted here:

http://www.fastliteproposal.com/pub/FastLiteProposal-Draft-0-0-1.doc

And just wanted to add my 2p of ideas... If I was to create a new format I 
would say:

*Scrap the body length
*Scrap the checksum length
*Send times as int64 eg as microseconds since 01-jan-2000
*Scrap sendcomp id, target comp id, constant fields, Message Sequence Number 
and other fix stuff which are not needed for data feeds
*Scrap heartbeats and logins from the client - only a test request is required
*Limit the scope of the dictionary to the current template and have no global 
dictionary even for template id
*Send a template id byte length so the user can skip templates he is not 
interest in and get an easy error check
*Scrap optional fields, make delta fields work like others with bit in pmap
*Add doubles to the sample application
*Post a sample console app in c# /java with blocking sockets that sends 
messages back and forth

With all that you have an easy to use general purpose data feed that works well 
enough I think.

[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to