[This message was posted by anand pandey of Deutsche Bank <[email protected]> to the "4.4 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/17. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/88fd327c - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> I disagree with the assessment below. FIX 4.2 already defines 207 as > datatype "Exchange", i.e. a MIC. Also, a change of reference from one > code list to another is something trivial and does no justice to the > significant conceptual changes between 4.2 and 4.4. These are for > example the introduction of the Parties component block and the > deprecation of ExecTransType and related changes to ExecType and > OrdStatus. > > I can only strongly recommend to read FIX 4.3 and FIX 4.4 Volume 6 > Appendix 6-E, 6-F and 6-G as well as the FIX 4.4 Release Notes to find > out what really changed between FIX 4.2 and FIX 4.4. > > Regards, Hanno. > > > The most important change is implementation of MIC codes in FIX > > 4.4 version. > > > > 207=T becomes 207=XTKS > > > > > > please check this is important. Hi market Identifier codes(MIC) is a four character code used to specify exchanges. How FIX.4.2 uses 207=T for tokyo and 4.4 onwards we have to give 207=XTKS, if no implementation change at technical level. Offcourse at business level they both means same used to identify market. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
