[This message was posted by jim whitehead of Fidessa Latent Zero <[email protected]> to the "4.2 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/5. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/e2b44dfe - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
The solution described in this trail seems logical to me, however if anyone is using an alternative solution, in production, I'd be very interested in hearing about it. Thanks in advance for your assistance Jim > Many thanks for your answer, Sonitta. I've eventually come across a > document on this site where they recommend the use of tag 81 > (ProcessCode) for this, and we'll most probably use it in conjunction > with tag 12 & 13. > > Regards, Ilyas > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We're currently trying to figure out how we can receive the > > > information related to the commission sharing agreement in the > > > NewOrderSingle FIX messages from our clients. > > > > > > Any experience/input on the subject would be great. > > > > > > Thanks, Ilyas > > > > > > Try using FIX tags 12(Commission) and 13(CommType). > > > > Thanks Sonitta [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
