[This message was posted by Changpeng  Yu of FT Computer Solutions 
<[email protected]> to the "4.0 Session" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/12. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/2719fa7b - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

> No, option 2 is not valid. A message with PosDupFlag does not 'advance'
> the counterparty's next expected sequence number--that's what the
> Sequence Reset - Gap Fill does.
> 
> > I have a scenario where broker/exchange asks for a resend. FIX42
> > scenario
> > - Lets say broker is missing 4-10 messages and asks for resend.
> > - client goes through the list and finds that messages 4-7 need not
> >   be send(whatever be the reason) instead send a gapfill message
> >   for them.
> >
> >    Client has two options.
> >    ----------------------
> >    option 1- it sends single gapfill message for 4-7 stating next
> >    sequence is 8. then sends messages 8-10 with dup flag. option 2- It
> >    sends messages 8-10 with dup flag. then sends a single gapfill
> >    message with seq 10 and nextseq to 11.
> >
> >   if option-2 is viable then I would like to implement option-2.
> >   Please advise. ~Vimal
Actually, when the opposit party send you a resend request, they will adjust 
the expected incoming sequence number to the one (4). So, your resend message 
has to be starting with (4). If that is a application message, you need send 
it. Otherwise, you need to send a gapfill(4, 8). Next is message(8).

Good luck,
peng

Free Download FixExpress at http://www.eptop.com/FIX/FixExpress.htm 

[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to