[This message was posted by jim whitehead of Fidessa Latent Zero <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/a7dee6b1 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Good Morning I'm working on a project around commission sharing agreements (csa) with particular reference to shipping the details out on a FIX message (NOS/NOL rather than notification). I've looked through the spec's and this website for suggestions about what the industry standard may be, a discussion on the 4.2 Changes forum (http://www.fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/88a1c445) suggests that the best use would be to use the regular commission tags (12,13) along with ProcessCode (81) to signify a CSA. I can certainly see the logic of this but I would be extremely interested to hear from any other sites who have a solution in production, particularly if both execution and research commission details are being sent. Thanks in advance for your help Jim [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
