[This message was posted by Richard Labs of CL&B Capital Management, LLC 
<[email protected]> to the "Algorithmic Trading" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/31. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/9ac5172f - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

> In the documentation you mention an ExecInst='e'= "work to target
> strategy". Does this flag still make sense in 5.0SP1?
> 
> Is the sell side supposed to ignore field TargetStrategy(847) if this
> field isn't there or reject the order?
> 
> What is the point of having a flag that tells you to use an
> optional field?

Tag 847 was a early attempt to enumerate every algo strategy offered as a 
straight enumeration.

1       VWAP
2       Participate (i.e. aim to be x percent of the market volume)
3       Mininize market impact

>From a FIXatdl prospective that tag is obsolete. That approach (enumerate all 
>strategies at FIX) proved impossible in the real world. It's impossible for 
>FIX to be the central reposiory of every algo strategy (in every version and 
>flavor) in a strict, neat enumeration. 

In FIXatdl, the only thing you are guaranteed (by intention, don't rely on XML 
to actually enforce this via "well formed and validating") is,  once you have 
selected a specific Target (the entity who will recieve the algo order), you 
are guaranteed that the algo strategy name PLUS the version number, is unique 
(like a KEY field). Across Targets there is no consistency, no guarantees.

Perhaps in time we can FIX standardize some generic algo strategies. For the 
moment however there is zero attempt.  

 


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to