[This message was posted by Johan Axelsson of Cinnober Financial Technology 
<[email protected]> to the "Product Discussion" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/24. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/278ca95c - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Thank you so much for your reply!

/Johan

> I assume that you have control over both ends of the link, so you are
> only looking to compress data that you route through your
> infrastructure. A couple of options:
> 
> 1. Use WAN Optimization from Cisco or Riverbed.
> 2. Change to use FAST for 70% compression.
> 
> Here is a link to a good paper on WAN Optimization: http://www.netqos.c-
> om/Google/metzler_report/application_delivery.html?gclid=CM2cn7SJh5kCFR-
> aA3godQD4Mmg
> 
> 
> -Alex
> 
> > What options (e.g. hardware) are there for compressing FIX links?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance!
> >
> > /Johan


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

  • [FIX] Re: Hardware for com... 'Product Discussion' forum at fixprotocol . org
    • [FIX] Re: Hardware fo... 'Product Discussion' forum at fixprotocol . org

Reply via email to