[This message was posted by Zahid Khan of LBS - Student <[email protected]> to the "Certification" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/9. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/bc61d6dc - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Should a FIX Message Parser always ignore 34=# on an inbound LonOn message? For example, the parser is expecting the next inbound MsgSeqNum to be 80 <34=80> and it is not expected that the next message would be a Logon Message <35=A>. However, the next inbound message is a Logon message, and its MsgSeqNum is lower than expected, say 78. Now in this case, should the parser acknowledge the LogOn and then do a PossDup/PossResend analysis or should it ignore the LogOn altogether and send a ResendRequest. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
