[This message was posted by Mahendra  Kumar of  <[email protected]> to 
the "4.2 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/5. You can 
reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/b79b5f7d - PLEASE DO 
NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

> Hi,
> 
> Need Suggestion.
> 
> 1) Is it compulsory that the first tag of the repeating group is
>    mandatory if the repeating group is > 0 ?
> 
> 2) Is it compulsory that, the first tag must be the first tag in the
> repeating group ? (I means , in respective to position.)

Hi ,

Pls see the below notes for the above one:

The two rules you can enforce with solidarity from other FIX developers 
(occasionally documented in the FIX 4.4 spec) are 

1) that the first documented field tag of a repeating group must always be 
present and must always be first

2) the first field tag encountered not defined to be in the group ends the 
repeating group. Beyond that you will encounter much variation in the order of 
fields - both inside and outside repeating groups. 

Regards,

Kumar.

[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to