[This message was posted by Kent Vogel of Parity Energy, Inc. <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/5e9e7c50 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
> > If a SequenceReset message is received, with say NewSeqNo<36>=100, > > then another message is received with Seq # 99, how should the message > > be handled? > > > > Our FIX engine (Quickfix) ignores any message below 100 and only > > begins handling the messages 100 and above. Should it instead reject > > those messages as Seq Num too low? > > Unless your counterparty FIX engine is acting weird, it's probably > sending these messages as a result of a ResendRequest you(r FIX > engine) sent(?) Yes that is the case. When the initiator connects to my side, it adds 100 to the last sequence #, call it X. My side then sends a resend reqeust for X to 0. The initiator then sends a reset to X+102, then is starts sending application messages starting with X+101. My side ignores the X+101 message and does normal processing for the others X+102 and on. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
