[This message was posted by Hanno Klein of Deutsche Börse Systems 
<[email protected]> to the "Website Feedback" discussion forum at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/38. You can reply to it on-line at 
http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/aee99175 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

I also think that this is good information to have in an overview but it is not 
part of the functionality per se. It is technical information about the size of 
the FIX "toolbox" available to solve business problems. I am not sure what 
value a single number per version has and how one would interpret that with the 
different colors for the various pieces of functionality. It is quite obvious 
that the number of standard session messages is pretty stable, business 
messages steadily increase and tags increase more significantly. The 
information can be retrieved from the FIX repository.

Would you be willing to compile the numbers if a separate table were added, for 
example to the FIX Repository (http://fixprotocol.org/repository) page?

> This is an enhancement request to the FIX Functionality matrix at
> http://fixprotocol.org/functionality. Add three rows to show for each
> version the number of
> 
> Standard Session messages Standard Business messages Standard Tags
> 
> This would make it easier for viewers of the functionality matrix to get
> a feel for "relative differences in complexity" between versions. I
> could not another easy way to get these numbers.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

  • [FIX] Re: Add three rows to ... 'Website Feedback' forum at fixprotocol . org

Reply via email to