[This message was posted by Guangbin Xu of SSE <[email protected]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/04f53f75 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
As we all know, FIX5.0 introduces the concept of TI (transportation Independence). I'm trying to implement FIX over FAST and want all messages to be numbered and sequenced in the FIX4.1 way, which I think is easier for in-order message recovery. So the FIXT seems a more proper solution of session control. However, I want FIX over FAST. The problem then is: are there incompatible aspects and tricky things I have to handle there? What is the major discrepancy between FAST SCP and FIXT? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
