[This message was posted by Danilo Silveira of Greenline Financial Technologies <[email protected]> to the "4.4 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/17. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/dafc327d - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hi all, This is more a QuickFIX implementation doubt than a FIX doubt. Anyone has experienced problems with disabling this QuickFIX socket option? I'm having a problem that the messages are delaying to be acknowledged. And I need to figure out where is the bottleneck. Thoughts? [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
