[This message was posted by Mahesh Kumaraguru of  <[email protected]> to the 
"General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can 
reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/8b537de6 - PLEASE DO 
NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

I see this combination TimeInForce 59=3 Immediate or Cancel and ExecInst 18 = G 
All or None as a perfectly valid combination to mean

Either Immediately Execute the Full Quantity
or Cancel it Fully Immediately

The buy side wants a Full Execution now or a Full Cancel now.

> Is there a standard or recommended practice when an order has
> TimeInForce(tag 59)=3 Immediate or Cancel (IOC) and ExecInst(tag 18)=G
> All or none (AON) in an exchange/ECN/ATS environment. Immediate Or
> Cancel behavior is to fill what can be filled on the order and cancel
> any unfilled portion. ExecInst=AON means the order must be fill
> completely or cancelled (but the order can rest in the book - as opposed
> to a Fill Or Kill order where the order must be fully filled or canceled
> without resting in the book).
> 1. Should the order be rejected due to incompatible attributes?
> 2. Should the TimeInForce=IOC take precedence over the ExecInst=AON -
>    effectively ignoring the ExecInst?
> 3. Should the TimeInForce=IOC behavior be modified to act as a
>    TimeInForce=FOK behavior because the ExecInst=AON is specified?
> 4. Some other alternative I haven't thought of?
> 
> It doesn't seem to me that the ExecInst=AON should override the
> TimeInForce instruction - meaning the order should not be allowed to sit
> in the book.


[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[email protected]]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to