[This message was posted by Amrit Bharadwaj of Nomura <[email protected]> to the "4.2 Changes" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/5. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/86b36688 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hi Jonas, Perhaps you can use some validations in your FIX Engine something similar to the below: reset_seqnum_on_initial_logon = ON trading_session_auto_eod = ON trading_session_auto_retry = ON trading_session_connection_allowed_outside_trading_session = ON This would allow the Session to reset the sequence numbers each time on a logon Request. Thanks, Amrit > Hello FIX community, > > We have a client which is rejecting our ResendRequests if the amount of > requested messages exceeds a certain number. > > My question now is whether this is legitimate (according to the FIX spec > I reckon they have to serv any ResendRequest), > > and if yes, how should this scenario be handled? For example, drop the > session and Logon again with resetting the numbers (141=Y)? But that > does not solve the problem that some messages are missing. > > Thanks in Advance > > Jonas [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
