[This message was posted by Matthew Chimento of Marco Polo Networks Inc. <mjchime...@yahoo.com> to the "4.0 Session" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/12. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/cefccc15 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Technically yes. In the early days of FIX 4.0, this eventually became a headache for the operations people whom monitor the FIX sessions. Over the years, most FIX companies have built in a logic to use the incoming HeartBeat value as their HeartBeat value. Something to think about as a parameter if you developing your FIX engine. Matt > So to be clear the acceptor should immediately disconnect? > > > No. There should only be one heartbeat interval. > > > > Per FIX 4.3 Volume 2's "Heartbeats" section: > > > > "Note that the same HeartBtInt value is used by both sides, the Logon > > "initiator" and Logon "acceptor"." > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Is it FIX compliant if two counterparties manages to establish a > > > connection with different heartbeat intervals? > > > > > > Regards Harry > > > [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:unsubscribe+100932...@fixprotocol.org] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to fix-proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fix-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
