[This message was posted by Bernt Sanden of Cinnober Financial Technology <[email protected]> to the "General Q/A" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/22. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/a193bf01 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Hi All, FIX 5.0 has a very good way to represent how the Trade Capture Report should be handled by the Respondent. Tag 1123 TradeHandlingInstr is used for this purpose. 1123 is for example used to differ between "One-Party Report for Matching" and "Two-party report". There is no good way in FIX 4.4 to represent the same thing. I have seen FIX 4.4 implementations using 856=1 (Alleged) to represent the correspondent to 1123=2 "One-Party Report for Matching" and 856=0 (Submit) to represent the correspondent to 1123=1 "Two-party report". I would like to use tag 1123 in FIX 4.4. What is the recommende practice here? Is it OK to use that tag as is or should we use a custom tag 20000+ with same enumerations for the same purpose? Regards, Bernt Sandén [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
